Vasudev Kutumbakam
A few years ago a neighbor who had shifted to Singapore returned back to our neighborhood after a year. The reason he came back to India was that he and his family were unable to adjust to the excessive orderly and disciplined life of Singapore. They missed the chaos of India.
We Indians prefer everything to be complex and chaotic. Just think of all the ceremonies and rituals we practice for every occasion from pre-birth to death. We prefer color, complexity and chaos along with fun, divinity and collectiveness.
Geert Hofstede developed the Cultural dimension theory which is a framework for Cross cultural communication. The theory describes the effect of a society's culture on the values of its members, and how these values relate to behavior. One of the important dimension explained in this theory is individualism versus collectivism. Individualist society has a loosely knit social framework compared to a collectivist society which has a tightly knit social framework. Personal achievement and individual rights are emphasized in the former whereas collectivist societies prefer cohesiveness and membership affiliations.
Indians today stand on the threshold between being a collectivist society and moving more towards an individualistic society. The generation X and Y who form a major part of the work force in India now can be called the sandwiched generation. This generation grew up in a society that believed in collectivist values. Most of their childhood was in joint families or in closely knit neighborhood. Exposure to an overdose of team spirit and collaboration lectures from their management professors and organisation leaders coupled with an opportunity to travel across the world and settle in various countries which believe in individualism led to confusion. Now, began the confusion about what to follow.....individualism like the western world or collectivism like the eastern world.
Debates began on many platforms whether kids should be brought up as independent individuals or they should be taught to accommodate and live with other members of the family; whether joint family is better or nuclear family; should children be permitted to make career choices on their own or should parents decide for them ; should individual performance be rewarded or teams be rewarded and on many such topics.
The generation X and Y is the sandwiched generation because they have to respect their parents who still believe in collectivism and expect them to be part of social functions and get involved in extended family matters, but their kids do not believe in socializing with people they cannot connect. One generation believes that whatever is cooked must be eaten by all family members happily whereas one believes that each should eat what they like and individual choices must be respected. Food courts in malls are always over crowded because they cater to all three generations and each can pick their choice of food. Gone are the days when whole family would listen to the same music or watch the same television shows together. The popularity of personal screen is due to individual taste being given more importance than collective choices.
Traditionally we Indians believe in embracing the whole world and living collectively as we have our roots as an agrarian society. Stress today is high due to the balancing act most Indians are having to do and since most are themselves confused which way to go. In order to live peacefully we need to make a choice of continuing as a collectivist society or supporting individualism only but, moving away from the threshold is necessary to clear the confusion.
I choose collectivism because I believe it has more advantages and helps to cope with any setbacks of life in a better way and also helps to double happiness in life. Enjoy the festivals safely but collectively.
Let me know your choice in the comments section.
A very thin line separates individualism from bordering on selfishness and unsettling conduct and collectivism from bordering on being imposing and stifling. Neither would be conducive to peaceful living I feel. A balanced situation would be ideal, though easier wished for, than actually lived i understand.
ReplyDeleteThat part about the "sandwiched generation" is bang on! So relatable! 😉
Time for me to argue with uncle who is the sandwiches generation......
DeleteThat era is over I keep reminding him when he still reminisces. I have to point out that they are one of the 'slices' now.. And their dear grand kids the other.. It is us stuffed between a combo of 'mayonnaise' and 'hari chutney'.. 'burger' and 'veggies'! 😛 😂
DeleteI love this sandwiches and Hari chutney and mayonnaise... the real ones I mean... must admit I’m not a fan of being a sandwich generation
DeleteWell written Vidhya! A mix of both is probably how it works for many of us :p
ReplyDeleteTrue and that needs lot of accommodation.
DeleteThis is such an important subject...I wish it becomes a part of secondary school curriculum.... putting community needs ahead of individual needs ensures that an individual also benefits from it..collectivism is the need today (more than ever before).
ReplyDeleteI think we should live as per our preferences and as per what's possible. The "middle" path between collectivism and individualism is what resonates with me.
ReplyDeleteThe mighty Banyan tree, although rooted, "walks" by sending it's roots down in all directions from its branches. Duality exists and thrives. ��
True but when members of an organisation or family differ in their thinking the balancing act becomes very tough. Middle path in anything if followed by all is the best way of life.
DeleteThere is an African proverb... "It takes a village to raise a child". Different people add to the character of the child. Someone is tough, someone is kind, someone is knowledgeable, someone is naughty... and it is all this diversity that makes a person.
ReplyDeleteSince primitive times we were tribal and lived in small tribes, which were largish families. There were different configurations of tribes, some polygamous but that in another discussion. And then Agriculture made us smaller. We said only my family should benefit from my hard work on the fields. So a father, his sons, and their spouses and their children (3 generations) became a tribe. Smaller, slightly more selfish...
And then nuclear families came where we started thinking, why should my brother benefit from my hard work. And now we are moving towards a micro-nuclear system where we don't even think about our spouses and hence the rates of divorces and marital problems are going up putting the children in a challenging environment. The idea of putting the fellow man before one's own self, is antiquated. The circle is getting smaller.
Are we worse off? I would like to think so, but then again, us being tribal was all about survival. We did better as a tribe. But survival, as we can all agree now, isn't really at stake any more. We have, after all overpopulated the planet.
In fact, if survival is at stake, it is at a very individual level. earlier we wanted to survive as a tribe. Now we want our identities to survive, which we do lose in a tribe. And that's why the circle is becoming smaller and smaller.
I am a little old school and prefer a joint family system. But perhaps my time is long gone. Perhaps surviving individually, living in micro nuclear family systems is the future.
I think there are more than 3 generations when mindsets are compared. I feel around 4 different directions for every topic, be it the mundane daily meal menu or buying personal products. The "wants" and "needs" demarcation has now various definitions.
ReplyDeleteNimisha
I think, both can coexist with a little effort. Like the bhagvat gita says, atma is an ansh of the parmatma. However atma still has its own identity. One needs to maintain his individuality but still be willing to learn to lose his identity for the community.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThere should be empathy and respect for one another. Any human being or generation that fails to learn these two doesn't deserve togetherness. May he or they be in joint family or in nuclear family.
ReplyDeleteBoth collectivism and individualism have their merits and demerits. I believe a combination of both without excessive leaning towards one is good way to enjoy the benefits both has to offer.
ReplyDeleteTrue but tough to achieve unless all dont think thus.
DeleteA combination of both is what I think is good for all. Both collectivism & individualism have their plus & minus points. Live together (may not be under the same roof) & happily!
ReplyDeleteFor me collectivism without losing one s individuality
ReplyDeleteworks... generations now are losing the feeling of attachment ..have become more self centred.. So I think Joint family teaches them to respect & adjust to different individuals with diff personalities..